I’ve always loved history. Since elementary school it was one of my favorite subjects. But when I read Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States, I was introduced to a perspective on history that had never occurred to me until then: History is written by the winners. And the history of Christianity is not any different. Those that wrote down Church history were those that had power.
A man named, Eusebius–who lived around 300 AD–is typically referred to as the “father of Church history.” Eusebius was also the biographer and eulogist of the most powerful man in the world at the time; Constantine, the emperor of Rome. So, it is clear that Eusebius was writing from a particular perspective and that it was certain to be favorable of his boss.
Can we assume that the history we read from writers such as Eusebius to be the only perspective? I don’t think so. We often find that those who wrote positively about the Church and it’s relationship to economic or political power to have been biased, neglecting much of the reality for common people during that era.
In A World History of Architecture, the authors write, “The adage ‘history is written by the winners’ is nowhere more strikingly illustrated than in the generation of Eusebius… Modern historians have caught Eusebius out in promoting his vision of unity in harmony at the expense of the messier reality called historical truth; Constantine’s Church was neither unified nor harmonious. Little wonder, then, that Eusibius’ vision of God’s edifice would nourish the architects–actual and metaphorical–of a Christian empire for a millennium to come.”
Were the voices and experiences of the losers ever documented? Sure. And just as Howard Zinn has shown, with a little bit of digging around, you can find the voices of the dissenters; those that were reluctant of the Church’s relationship to the state or market. It’s just that they’re usually harder to find.
I’ve decided to start posting every once in awhile on some of these “dissenters”. I’m calling it “A People’s History of the Church”. It’s a nod to Zinn and his approach to history. Of course, I’m not a historian, so this won’t be academic stuff. My desire to write these forthcoming posts comes from a conviction of mine. That conviction is that our history animates us. It provides a story to live into today. If we read history wrong, we live wrong. I want to live as best as possible and as I’ve read stories of Christians that have lived in contrast to the status quo I have found hope to live out my faith in ways that counter those that are popularized in our culture. I won’t be posting chronologically. I will be posting on things as I read, or pulling from past things I have read. And it will continue to be mixed with the other things we write about here on the Ecclesia Collective blog. If you have books, links, ideas, etc. please feel free to post them in the comments or even submit a story for us to post by emailing us at ecclesiasd [at] gmail [dot] com.
If this already has you interested, I would recommend you pick up Radical Faith by Mennonite author John Driver. This book is the closest thing to a people’s history of the Church that I have read yet. It’s not easy to find nor is it cheap. But it is worth it. Driver documents several dissenting Christian movements throughout history and, of course, he includes the Anabaptists. I would also recommend you read Water, Faith & Wood by my friend, Chris Smith. Chris does a great job familiarizing the common reader to the Early Church (approximately the first 3 centuries of the Church) as well as provide practical lessons for today from the life of the Early Church. Chris includes contemporary translations of a lot of Early Church texts in his book as well.

8 comments
Daniel says:
Sep 3, 2008
I look forward to reading your articles on the “dissenters”, I have been interested in learning more about more “untold” history of the church for some time now. As I’ve learned more about certain “church fathers”, such as say Cyprian or Origen, I’ve begun to learn just how much non-biblical practice and teaching has crept into the church over the centuries through such “great” men. It definately seems that most of the history of the church is written by those more concerned with the detailing of their own legacies, rather than quietly and anonymously serving the lowly and lost among them.
I want to learn about the early christians who DIDN’T seek to build their own little kingdoms!
Can’t wait to read about what God shows you…..
[Reply]
j evans says:
Sep 4, 2008
Thanks for commenting, Daniel. Good to hear you have already read up on some of this! I look forward to learning from you as well.
[Reply]
Shawn Beaty says:
Sep 10, 2008
Robert Webber has great work based on the worship of the Early Church. Dr Jim Smith at Bethel has written a few things in Christian History Magazine about this topic.
I dis-agree with you Daniel. You make the assumption that they were all about themselves. I am sure when people look at the story of our lives through skeptics eyes they will be able to find nothing but scandal and selfishness. We may want to examine people (even dead ones) through the eyes of Christ and trust that he is a bit soveriegn in the story of his bride.
[Reply]
j evans says:
Sep 10, 2008
Trust in Christ being sovereign doesn’t mean that we can’t look at ourselves and our history with a critical eye. Self-examination as individuals, as the Church–present and past–seems beneficial to our continuing transformation into Christ-likeness. Jesus did this, the prophets did this, the apostles and Paul did this. We do have a lot within our history that evokes a power-hungriness within our midst. Honestly evaluating this and admitting to it doesn’t mean that we think we are better today. It keeps me humble; realizing that we are bound to make selfish errors. But learning from our history and where we have made mistakes can possibly help us avoid making some of those same mistakes in the future.
[Reply]
Brooke Gonzales says:
Sep 11, 2008
Sounds interesting J. You know that I love Zinn, so anything Zinn-ish intrigues me. I am wondering, if you claim that Christian history (or mainstream Christian history) was written by those in power, how does this translate to the Bible, who wrote it, and who decided what should be put in it? I realize that it gets a little controversial when questioning the validity of the Bible, but I was curious to see if you would be discussing that as well.
[Reply]
j evans says:
Sep 11, 2008
Well, Brooke, there you go opening a big ol’ can of worms! Still, your questions are GREAT! And you’re correct to assume that it brings up a whole lot of conflict typically. Nonetheless, I will write about that as well. Thanks for asking.
[Reply]
tom airey says:
Nov 7, 2008
Jason…I love this Peoples’ History of the Church…keep this series going…I’m hungry for MORE!!!!
[Reply]
Glen says:
Dec 8, 2008
Sounds interesting…
A very good book on the history and beliefs of the Early Church that includes many of their writings as well as commentary is “The Early Christains: In their Own Words” by Eberhard Arnold. It is available as an E-book at:http://www.plough.com/ebooks/pdfs/EarlyChristians.pdf
[Reply]